It was a crisp, sunny Sunday morning as I met some of the tenants of the dismal
Greenleaf property who are righteously refusing to pack and go. They are people with names which I will not disclose. They are middle class working people just like you, just like me.
Here is a short list of some of the tenant's vocations:
Retail manager-Banana Republic- Hair Stylist- Marketing specialist- State employee-Railroad- Airline security- Real Estate- Visual Merchandising- Floral designer-Construction-
One woman has lived there for 8 years, another for 1 year, and others signed leases just last fall. Now this is part of the reason the remaining 18 tenants are upset. QHC Inc. was the previous owner who employed Wesley Realty Management Company's on-site manager. The east side of this courtyard building, built in 1916, is co-op and the west side is rental. As most owners are aware, the closing of a property takes a certain amount of preparation time before the papers are signed. In
September, 2005 QHC was actively renting apartments knowing that a sale was in progress.
The sale was final in October, 2005.
While QHC owned the property, maintenance was sometimes rather slow or haphazard in making repairs unless the tenants were assertive. They had to constantly remind Wesley/QHC that the roof was leaking, the plaster was falling, the screens were missing or the lights were burned out. Just those simple little things one pays rent for! On a side note, condo owners have to deal with the same issues and
often have a less than fair outcome if the issue and the votes are swayed by one groups’ agenda!A letter from New City, the new owner, dated October 31, 2005 was posted in vestibules but not addressed and delivered to individual tenants. No mention was made of the transference of security deposits from QHC. In fact, QHC didn’t post a letter but placed the blame on the onsite maintenance person from Wesley Realty Management Company. The defendants attorney's are refusing to allow that maintenance person to make a deposition in the case. Wonder why?
Soon thereafter, tenants noticed problems with heat and electricity. The heat was either cranked full blast rendering pets unconscious or the heat was not on at all. The latter was usually the case. The new owners must have saved a bundle over winter weekends without on-site maintenance to check the boiler. If you recall, December was very cold. The tenants sought legal assistance and retained an attorney to represent them.
Prior to this sale, QHC re-set the back porches after removing most of the concrete courtyard to create green space. The procedure was not properly done rendering the porches dangerous enough to be cited as hazardous in August 2005 by the City.

Other building issues were later discovered when inspectors responded to the tenants constant calls, but under the current Catch-22 building code,
once a violation has been cited, additional amendments or citations cannot be added until the original violation is settled in court. Other citations that could not be written up included raw sewerage backing up into bathtubs. At one point, cable wires and ungrounded electrical wiring were draped and hanging across rear exits to the condemned porches. Remember, the law states two points of egress, yet the inspectors hands were tied over the single hazardous porch citation. Now that’s a City that works isn’t it?

Inside the building there were not only the leaks in the roof, but cracks in the plaster, broken windows, missing, ripped or patchwork screens, and non-working fire detectors. The buzzers don’t work properly, so tenants on top floors have the choice to buzz in strangers, traipse down three flights to see who’s there, or simply ignore them. Some choice right? Many of the outer doors don’t’ properly close and lock allowing entry to anyone. Some security right? Tenants now replace light bulbs but with so many dark, vacant apartments, the building provides the appearance of being abandoned, just what squatters look for. Some security, right?
This fixture is dangling by wires.
One young woman I met came home from a three day weekend to find a layer of construction dust in her apartment. There was a fine layer of dust inside her silverware drawer that seeped under the door and other crevices.

Another young couple with a 5 year old daughter and 2 year old son have had very sickly children this year. Construction is taking place in tiers while the tenants are still under lease with no concern for air pollution.
This is the landing below their door.
Small children live behind this dusty door.

The air pollution, possible remnants of lead paint, raw sewerage, poor water pressure and lack of heat should be enough to disgust any civilized human in a non-third world country such as ours. But the total disregard of human dignity or human rights ranks right up there with stories blogged about certain slumlords North of Howard.
Here are some unlocked gutted apartments. With a $1.5 million rehab loan, the new owners are attempting to create 2 bedroom condos from sensibly sized 1 bedroom apartments. Only very petite people with minimal furnishings might find them worth the money.

Beyond the inconvenience, the health hazards and a feeling of futility in fighting this battle, I asked what they hoped to accomplish. The tenants bottom line is to raise the awareness to the lawmakers of the City of Chicago and the State of Illinois to the true and
necessary need for affordable rental housing. There should be regulations on leasing while in the process of selling. There should be financial assistance for displacement. No one has the right to dictate if one must own property. It takes a certain amount of money and credit to buy and there are those who have neither. There are also those who don't want the hassle of 'owning' and paying taxes. It should be a personal choice. This situation not only forces middle class working singles and families out of a neighborhood but creates a scenario where ‘renters’ are an unwelcome, stigmatized group of people. Renters will become the nomads of the 21st Century forced to wear the letter “R” on their foreheads, the stigma of ‘renters’.
How dare the leaders of Rogers Park, or Chicago for that matter, pound their fists and declare that we are unique because of our diversity. It’s now becoming an
us versus them mentality.
Them renters must be banished and
us owners must save the ward. Rather than this being a story about people, it’s unfortunately again, a story about money. In a year or two, there will probably be a story about a condo owner in that building who realizes his ‘rehab’ was done so cheaply and quickly that it’s not up to code and guess what? He’ll pay to get it up to code.
This story is all about money not people, not safe, secure, affordable housing and definitely not about saving the middle working class.